Welcome to the Negative Zone. A parallel universe to the main reality of Marvel comics, the Negative Zone has many wonders to offer. The whole dimension is suffused with a breathable atmosphere, which allows for cool intergalactic battles without having to worry about little things like explosive decompression or asphyxiation. It is also home to an almost endless horde of man-eating super-insects, a prison for the worst super-villains in the multiverse and… not much else.
The same can be said of every major comic book universe. DC has the Phantom Zone, a barren wasteland where the greatest villains of Superman’s home planet are imprisoned. In Archie Comics, the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles face villains that have almost exclusively crawled their way out of Dimension X.
And why?
Why do all these monsters and villains come from, or get trapped in, a single alternate dimension? The second question is easier to answer, of course. Chucking a godlike super being into another dimension is clearly a much better method of disposing of him than locking him up in your local prison. It would be even better if any of these superheroes could find a way of stopping the villains from returning but hey, you can’t have everything, and who doesn’t love a rematch?
The second question is more interesting, and goes a little deeper. Why is it that these places exist solely as breeding grounds for monsters (The Negative Zone and Dimension X) or as prisons to hold psychos that already exist (The Phantom Zone)? Are we really expected to believe that these places have nothing redeemable about them? That there is no art or culture, no religion or music or anything of merit in an entire universe?
Of course, the laws of probability and the many universes theory, around which comic books realities tend to be built, would say yes. If every possible version of every possible world does exist, then surely there must be worlds where nothing good has ever happened, ever. Worlds where all anyone ever does is fight, and kill, and destroy. Worlds with no redeeming qualities.
And in terms of narrative, it’s much more satisfying to have an easily identified enemy with an obviously evil background, both historical and geographical. Having a character like Sauron come from the land of cupcakes and rainbow univ corns would be a tad confusing. Although it might explain why he was always in such a foul mood.
And when you start to look at it like that, you can see the same thing happening all over the shop. Take Mordor from JRR Tolkein’s Lord of the Rings. A region of arid desert, mountains, the occasional volcano, and hordes of evil creatures, what good has ever come out of Mordor? One of the possible origins of the Orcs, as proposed by Tolkein, is that they were originally ‘East Elves’ or ‘Avari’ that were captured and corrupted by Melkor (the Devil in Tolkein’s mythos). Add to this the fact that their costumes in early illustrations appear to have more than slight Middle Eastern influences, and it isn’t that much of a leap to realise that the Orcs are basically Middle Earth’s equivalent to every negativised Eastern group from Huns to Muslims. Now, I don’t want to cast aspersions on Tolkein’s attitude towards other faiths. But Tolkein is well known for the heavy Christian influence in his work. And my point is this; Why does Mordor need to be the source of all evil, and not one tiny bit of good? Why does evil have to spring from a desolate, foreign land with no redeeming features to it?
Evil, the worst evil, the kind that barely registers on the level of human comprehension, has to be externalised. It has to come from somewhere separate from our world, or a world that we understand, so that we can accept its existence. We don’t want to believe that humanity, or anything that looks or acts or feels like humanity, can be responsible for this level of destruction. We can’t even accept that something that comes from the same universe would act like this. So we have to push it to the boundary of the universe, to the edge of the map and, if possible, over the edge.
And as for the possible race association I alluded to earlier, well, it’s not that surprising, is it? Particularly in America, where a whole generation has grown up viewing the Middle East as nothing more than the source of pain and chaos. In a centralised West, everything beyond one’s borders becomes a negativised other. We don’t see the beauty and culture that these areas contain, because all we are presented with is an endless stream of information about all the horrors that they contain.
Even if evil does come from ‘our’ world, it is preferable that it come from far away. A few decades ago, almost all villains in actions films were vaguely Eastern European. Today, they tend to be Middle Eastern. As a society, we identify problem areas of the world as sources for conflict in our entertainment. Real-life disaster zones become fuel for fiction, granting villains their point of origin while ignroing everything else these places have to offer us. And just check out htis page from Astonishing X-men a few years back. According to Wolverine, nothing good comes out of Africa. The whole place is basically Hell on Earth, and he goes on to say that anyone who gets into power basically turns evil as soon as they’re in office.
Fiction and reality reflect each other to such an extent that it is so much easier to have two-dimensional villains from matching backgrounds. Evil can’t come from within us, so it must be externalised. But to make that externalisation satisfying, to merrit the world-destroying wars we wage on the likes of Annihilus, Sauron, and Krang, they, and their people, and their worlds, can have no redeeming features.
So why don’t we flip it? I would like Marvel and DC, and any writer anywhere, to mix things up. Show us the good in the evil dimension or country. Don’t just fill it up with 2D monsters. Create real, flesh and blood characters with proper cultures and histories beyond the need to lay waste to everything they see.
Because yes, the world beyond our borders can be horrifying. But it can be kind of beautiful, too. If we let it.